Skip to Main Content

How to Play a Fed Rate Pause: Go Long the Nasdaq 100®

With the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) at or nearing the end of its current monetary tightening cycle, a weight has been lifted off growth stocks. That should represent a tailwind for companies with robust innovation pipelines combined with strong underlying fundamentals—exactly the kind found within the BMO Nasdaq 100 Equity ETF Fund and its advantages.

May 2023

Photo of Mark Marex

Mark Marex

CFA, Director, Index Research and Development, Nasdaq

Read bio

Key Takeaways

  • As interest rate hikes taper, growth stocks’ fundamentals have improved while sectors like financials have come under pressure.
  • The downturn of 2022 overshadowed several supportive long-run trends for the Index, including the move to electric vehicles (EVs), renewables, industrial automation and AI.
  • The BMO Nasdaq 100 Equity ETF Fund provides Canadian investors broad exposure to U.S. growth and innovation stocks that have consistently outperformed the broader market.

This year has seen technology shares bounce comfortably off the lows of 2022—the Nasdaq-100 Index® is clear evidence of that. What’s driving the rebound?

MM There are a few things going on that in many ways are the mirror image or opposite of what we saw last year. You simply can't discount the impact that inflation coming down is having on many Nasdaq-listed stocks. That’s given the Federal Reserve the ability to tell the market that this monetary tightening cycle is pretty much done. There is still uncertainty as to whether rates simply stay at this high plateau for an extended period, or the Fed is forced to start cutting rates in the face of a slowdown this year or next. But what we’ve seen from markets in general, and the Nasdaq in particular is that a significant weight has been lifted off growth equities. The Nasdaq-100 is not a growth index per se, but it does disproportionately skew towards that factor. Last year, when we put out research trying to help investors understand how this Index would react in a rising rate environment, we laid out the math. Every 75 bps hike—which is what the Fed was doing for most of last year—shaves off roughly 7% in terms of the present value of $1 in earnings 10 years out from today. The Fed lifted rates by 0.75 percentage points five times in the current cycle, which should have corresponded to a 35% reduction in the Nasdaq-100 Index. What happened? It finished down about 33%. Now, as investors re-position for a flat to falling rate environment, you’re seeing almost exactly what our models have predicted: a rebound based on the return of favourable fundamentals at attractive valuations; earnings, lower leverage ratios, high degrees of pricing power—all of these things are advantageous for Nasdaq-100 versus something like the S&P 500, which doesn’t hold the same growth tilt.

Consider the rise in generative AI that has propelled names like Nvidia, which is now the fifth biggest holding on the Nasdaq, almost doubling year to date in terms of price. That certainly helps drive index performance. There’s also been some other supports, such as the March banking crisis. When Silicon Valley Bank went under, the Nasdaq-100 outperformed the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average and had its longest consecutive daily streak of outperformance versus the S&P 500 since 2017. So as rate hikes have tapered, growth’s fundamentals have improved while other sectors have come under stress, this Index has moved back to being a kind of safe haven, not unlike what we saw three years ago when the pandemic first arrived. There’s no exposure to financials by design. And secondly, a lot of people just view those big tech names as ports in the storm.

The first-quarter earnings season delivered many upside surprises from Nasdaq-100 companies. Are there any observations investors can takeaway from this reporting period with respect to the rest of the year?

MM Q1 earnings came in quite a bit better than analysts and consensus estimates were anticipating. What’s important for people to understand is that COVID was such a big disruption to so many different areas of the economy, including causing a significant and pronounced slowdown in spending on technology across enterprise and consumer throughout the first three quarters of 2022. At the time, that looked like a flashing-red signal that maybe this was the start of a pretty nasty bear market. But to me and to certain people who've been following the space, we understood that a big part of that was just normalization from COVID. Spending was brought forward in 2021 in a big way, which of course would adversely affect growth rates in 2022, which is what we got—a temporary deceleration. That short-run weakness in turn overshadowed some pretty significant longer-run secular trends, like the move to EVs, the move to renewables, industrial automation and AI, which are what will propel growth for the Nasdaq-100 over the course of the next decade, regardless of what happens in terms of a temporary slowdown.

At the same time, last year brought about a tremendous amount of cost rationalization. Certain companies like Meta Platforms, who really took market feedback seriously in terms of cost discipline, and boosting bottom-line growth and being more disciplined. And you’re seeing all of that now coming to the surface— Meta had a tremendous positive reaction to earnings. Apple's reaction was fairly good. Microsoft's was exceptional for such a large company. We may not be in a bull market cycle like we witnessed a couple years ago. But it's not the depths of a tech recession, like we saw 20 years ago either.

For that Advisor or client who may not have a full understanding of the Nasdaq-100 and its component companies, or its history, can you sketch out a brief origin story from the Index’s beginnings to where it is today?

MM Absolutely. I’ll start by saying that it’s a very young Index relative to comparable options like the S&P 500, not just in terms of how long it’s been around, but in the companies that are listed. Nasdaq as a company was founded in 1971, becoming the world's first electronic exchange, and launched the Nasdaq Composite, which is the broadest benchmark we have. The Nasdaq-100 itself was launched in 1985. By that point, you had a couple of big names that had gone public, like Intel and Apple. Microsoft would go public the following year followed by other American blue-chip firms, including Cisco in 1990 and then Amazon in 1997, respectively. As we moved into the 2000s and 2010s, we would see Alphabet Inc. (Google), Meta Platforms (Facebook) and Tesla choose the Nasdaq to go public. These are some of the biggest names in the Index—the top seven issues comprise around 50% of the Index weighting. So the Index has really grown and evolved along with the exchange over the past three and a half decades into a position that today, the majority of technology-focused firms—certainly the biggest and most important ones—have listed with us, and continue to do so. Consider a sector like biotech, for example, where we have something like a 98% IPO win-rate. That shows how intertwined this exchange is with the most innovative companies, those new-economy firms that are propelling economic growth.

Let’s look at risk for a moment. An investor may look at the performance of some technology stocks in 2022 and surmise that they are volatile investments. What is the risk profile of the Nasdaq-100?

MM There’s definitely a cohort of investors that lived through the internet bubble in the late 90s and early 2000s, that are still somewhat anchored to this notion of, ‘Well, it's the Nasdaq. It has to be riskier than something like the S&P.’ Unfortunately, that’s just not true. As an example, let’s look at annualized volatility on a trailing 15-year basis. The difference between the Nasdaq and S&P 500 is around 2.5%, so two-hundred and fifty basis points. And when you look at the return differentials, annualized, it's quite a bit more than that in favour of the Nasdaq—sitting at over 4%. The outperformance of the Index over the past 16-17 years, after the end of the dot-com bubble established a new base to build a bull market off of, is more than two times the cumulative total return versus the S&P 500. It's been more than 2x for many years, and continues to be, even though we took a step back last year—and the Nasdaq-100 has made a lot of that decline back. What are you getting for that return? Concentrated exposure to new-economy sectors; disruptive tech, consumer discretionary, and bio-healthcare comprise 80% of the Index. Investors are gaining exposure to what we think are long-term secular trends that are very favorable for fundamental growth for not only top-line revenues, but earnings, dividends, buybacks—all that good stuff. Performance is driven by fundamentals, and fundamentals is driven by innovation. We look at this data day in and day out, and make the case to our clients about the factors that are responsible for driving that outperformance over the past decade and a half. And we feel very good about that trend continuing into the future.

Are there characteristics of the Nasdaq-100 Index that make it a more suitable option for technology exposure compared to indices or specific funds with a similar technology tilt? What are some key differentiators?

MM The simplest way to think about it is, when you look at a traditional sector definition of technology, the Nasdaq-100 is anywhere between 50-60% of that. A lot of people may be surprised by that percentage. You hear Nasdaq and assume 80, 90 or 100% if you go by that traditional sector definition. The Nasdaq-100 is much more diversified than some investors assume. You've got those top three new-economy sectors, which add up to around 80% of the Index weighting, and then you've got a few other sectors that fill in the rest, like telecoms, industrials, even some consumer staples. So, from a pure diversification standpoint, I think the Nasdaq-100 is much more attractive than going with a pure tech strategy. And certainly, I think on a risk-adjusted basis, it's better. But at the same time, you're getting something that I think is very unique in terms of the exposure, because you've got mostly growth, but infilled with some value, as well. We don't specifically screen for companies to include in the Index based on meeting various definitions of what makes a company a growth company in terms of sales, or a screening process that you'd find in a Factor ETF or a growth mutual fund; we don’t score companies based on specific growth metrics.

The Nasdaq-100 simply takes the largest companies that are listed on the exchange. And it happens to give an investor year in and year out a very consistent, very similar exposure to innovation and growth stocks. So, the profile is very unique in our view, because the main driver of what gets included on the Index is exchange-driven, it’s not subject to arbitrary rules around what a fund or screening model believes is a growth company, or what is a tech company. Is Amazon, a tech company? Some sector classifications call it a tech company, others consider it to be consumer discretionary. What about Netflix? Tesla's a similar story. So, while some investors may associate the Nasdaq-100 with pure-play technology, or IT or biotech or consumer tech, the reality is, the Index represents a core holding for any investor seeking innovation-fueled, diversified growth.

Excellent, thanks so much. Lastly, we sometimes ask our Portfolio Managers and Subject Matter Experts if there is a relevant book or podcast they can point to that may be of interest to our Advisor audience. Is there anything you’ve read or listened to lately that you’ve found instructive on markets or investing?

MM I’ll go with a podcast. I go through spurts where sometimes I’ll listen to a lot, and other times I just don't have the time. Right now, I like Odd Lots from Bloomberg. I think they do a tremendous job of keeping the guestlist relevant to whatever's happening in the market. The topics are interesting, but often not something core to my interests. So it teaches me something. For example, I'm not necessarily a crypto guy, but sometimes they'll do several episodes in a row about crypto. Another example: they did some very informative episodes on the lumber industry, when we had a massive shortage in the U.S. and Canada during COVID, to try to understand how the mechanics of that industry work, and how it impacts things like new housing construction. Other times, they’ll cover semiconductors or inflation or monetary policy. I'm a big fan.

For more information on the BMO Nasdaq-100 Equity ETF Fund, contact your BMO Global Asset Management Regional Representative.

Disclosures:

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS

FOR ADVISOR USE ONLY. No portion of this communication may be reproduced or distributed to clients as it may not comply with Sales Communications requirements.

Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent simplified prospectus.

The information in this trade idea is for information purposes. The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as, investment, tax or legal advice to any party. Investments should be evaluated relative to the individual’s investment objectives and professional advice should be obtained with respect to any circumstance.

The portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice and only represent a small percentage of portfolio holdings. They are not recommendations to buy or sell any particular security.

The viewpoints expressed by the Portfolio Manager represents their assessment of the markets at the time of publication. Those views are subject to change without notice at any time without any kind of notice. The information provided herein does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to sell securities nor should the information be relied upon as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This communication is intended for informational purposes only.

Nasdaq® is a registered trademark of Nasdaq, Inc. (which with its affiliates is referred to as the “Corporations”) and is licensed for use by the Manager. The ETF has not been passed on by the Corporations as to their legality or suitability. The ETF is not issued, endorsed, sold, or promoted by the Corporations. The Corporations make no warranties and bear no liability with respect to the ETF.

This communication is intended for informational purposes only and is not, and should not be construed as, investment and/or tax advice to any individual. Particular investments and/or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s circumstances. Individuals should seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, regarding any particular investment.

Commissions, management fees and expenses (if applicable) may be associated with investments in mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs). Trailing commissions may be associated with investments in mutual funds. Please read the fund facts, ETF Facts or prospectus of the relevant mutual fund or ETF before investing. Mutual funds and ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

For a summary of the risks of an investment in BMO Mutual Funds or BMO ETFs, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus of the relevant mutual fund or ETF. BMO ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.

BMO Mutual Funds are offered by BMO Investments Inc., a financial services firm and separate entity from Bank of Montreal. BMO ETFs are managed and administered by BMO Asset Management Inc., an investment fund manager and portfolio manager and separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.

BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate.

®/™Registered trademarks/trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.

Follow BMO

* As compared to an investment that generates an equivalent amount of interest income.

®/™Registered trademarks/trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.

BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate. Certain of the products and services offered under the brand name, BMO Global Asset Management are designed specifically for various categories of investors in a number of different countries and regions and may not be available to all investors. Products and services are only offered to such investors in those countries and regions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. BMO Financial Group is a service mark of Bank of Montreal (BMO).

BMO ETFs are managed and administered by BMO Asset Management Inc., an investment fund manager and portfolio manager and separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal. Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in exchange traded funds. Please read the prospectus before investing.

Exchange traded funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

BMO Mutual Funds are managed by BMO Investments Inc., which is an investment fund manager and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.

Commissions, trailing commissions (if applicable), management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the ETF facts, fund facts or prospectus of the relevant mutual fund before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO Mutual Funds, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus. ETF Series of the BMO Mutual Funds trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.

BMO Life Assurance Company is the issuer of the BMO Segregated Funds individual variable insurance contract referred to in the Information Folder and the guarantor of any guarantee provisions therein. The BMO GIF Information Folder and Policy Provisions provide full details and govern in all cases. BMO GIF products are offered through BMO Life Assurance, a separate legal entity than BMO Global Asset Management and wholly owned by BMO Financial Group. Segregated funds are only available for sale by individuals with appropriate insurance licences and are not considered a mutual fund. Segregated fund fees are higher than mutual funds as they include insurance fees to provide for the guarantees on deposits at maturity or on death.

Legal and regulatory disclosures

This information is for Investment Advisors only. By accepting, you certify that you are an Investment Advisor. If you are NOT an Investment Advisor, please decline and view the content in the Investor or Institutional areas of the site. The website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide a complete description of BMO Global Asset Management’s products or services. Past performance is not indicative of future results. It should not be construed as investment advice or relied upon in making an investment decision. Products and services of BMO Global Asset Management are only offered in jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale. The information contained in this Website does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone to buy or sell any investment fund or other product, service or information to anyone in any jurisdiction in which an offer or solicitation is not authorized or cannot be legally made or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make an offer of solicitation. All products and services are subject to the terms of each and every applicable agreement. It is important to note that not all products, services and information are available in all jurisdictions outside Canada.